http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/ Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:54:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-301 Kaushal Sat, 17 May 2008 12:50:31 +0000 http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-301 nice one, this too i agree with the author, in that converting From's to King's seems the better option nice one, this too
i agree with the author, in that converting From’s to King’s seems the better option

]]> http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-97 checkersisfortramps Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:17:24 +0000 http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-97 I think the next one should include the anti-bird's line with e3, including some of the ideas behind the early bishop move. Although, it shouldn't be limited to that anaylsis, since we are obviously going to chose other lines in our next show down. I think the next one should include the anti-bird’s line with e3, including some of the ideas behind the early bishop move. Although, it shouldn’t be limited to that anaylsis, since we are obviously going to chose other lines in our next show down.

]]> http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-94 Jeffrey Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:57:49 +0000 http://greenpointchess.org/2007/10/21/froms-gambit-part-1/#comment-94 Thanks for opening this discussion on such a high note, Greg! I look forward to continuing our dialogue about From's both in this blog and over the board. Thanks for opening this discussion on such a high note, Greg! I look forward to continuing our dialogue about From's both in this blog and over the board.

]]>