<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Greenpoint Chess and Go Club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenpointchess.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenpointchess.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Nice collection of chess sets by Jon C.</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/11/nice-collection-of-chess-sets/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/11/nice-collection-of-chess-sets/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Hello and thanks for your comments.  Yes, everything shown on the site is in my personal collection.  I am not a seller or dealer, just a collector, so the site is solely for the benefit of collectors around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and thanks for your comments.  Yes, everything shown on the site is in my personal collection.  I am not a seller or dealer, just a collector, so the site is solely for the benefit of collectors around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nice collection of chess sets by Richard</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/11/nice-collection-of-chess-sets/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/11/nice-collection-of-chess-sets/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>That certainly is a fine collection that guy has. His collection of Staunton (assuming he owns all those listed) is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That certainly is a fine collection that guy has. His collection of Staunton (assuming he owns all those listed) is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by Jeffrey Barke</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Barke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Me neither. I took the position from a game in Chernev&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Logical Chess Move By Move&lt;/em&gt;. What a great move! White is winning, but to &lt;em&gt;win&lt;/em&gt; either the f-pawn or the knight have got to go. Re6 addresses both in one move!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1242964&quot; rel=&quot;external&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1242964&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me neither. I took the position from a game in Chernev&#0039;s <em>Logical Chess Move By Move</em>. What a great move! White is winning, but to <em>win</em> either the f-pawn or the knight have got to go. Re6 addresses both in one move!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1242964" rel="external" rel="nofollow">http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1242964</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by checkersisfortramps</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>checkersisfortramps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-754</guid>
		<description>omg i meant e6 not d6, but in any case, i would never have seen Re6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omg i meant e6 not d6, but in any case, i would never have seen Re6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by checkersisfortramps</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>checkersisfortramps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-753</guid>
		<description>very nice-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by Jeffrey Barke</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Barke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;1. Re6!! If 1...fxe6, then 2. Qxg6+ Kh8 3. Qh6+ Kg8 4. Bh7+ Kh8 5. Bf5+ Kg8 6. Bxe6+ Rf7 7. Bxf7#&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Re6!! If 1&#8230;fxe6, then 2. Qxg6+ Kh8 3. Qh6+ Kg8 4. Bh7+ Kh8 5. Bf5+ Kg8 6. Bxe6+ Rf7 7. Bxf7#</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by checkersisfortramps</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>checkersisfortramps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-751</guid>
		<description>ok i&#039;m thinking 1. Nd6 fxd6 2. Qxg6+ Kh8 ....and then either Re5 or g4 then g5
neither of those ideas seem fast enough though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok i&#8217;m thinking 1. Nd6 fxd6 2. Qxg6+ Kh8 &#8230;.and then either Re5 or g4 then g5<br />
neither of those ideas seem fast enough though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by Jeffrey Barke</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Barke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I did the diagram wrong and forgot one crucial attacking piece (Ng5)! Sorry about that!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the diagram wrong and forgot one crucial attacking piece (Ng5)! Sorry about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An interesting move by checkersisfortramps</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2010/01/02/an-interesting-move/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>checkersisfortramps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=607#comment-749</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know, at first glance it seems like white has won, just sac sac mate.  but then after Bxg6, the rules of the game allow black to not recapture and just calmly defend with the knight.  the immediate rook lift to e3 is no good because of the knight fork on g4 evicting the queen.  but maybe, Bxg6- black moves, then rook lift to e3 would work? since now the knight can&#039;t leave f6.  not sure if that&#039;s interesting enough though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know, at first glance it seems like white has won, just sac sac mate.  but then after Bxg6, the rules of the game allow black to not recapture and just calmly defend with the knight.  the immediate rook lift to e3 is no good because of the knight fork on g4 evicting the queen.  but maybe, Bxg6- black moves, then rook lift to e3 would work? since now the knight can&#8217;t leave f6.  not sure if that&#8217;s interesting enough though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Play the Polar Bear! by Play the Polar Bear! . Blog Archive . Greenpoint Chess and Go Club at Chess News</title>
		<link>http://greenpointchess.org/2009/12/29/play-the-polar-bear/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Play the Polar Bear! . Blog Archive . Greenpoint Chess and Go Club at Chess News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenpointchess.org/?p=574#comment-713</guid>
		<description>[...] View post: Play the Polar Bear! . Blog Archive . Greenpoint Chess and Go Club [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post: Play the Polar Bear! . Blog Archive . Greenpoint Chess and Go Club [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
